NewNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
Tuesday night’s vice presidential debate offered a refreshing change from the aggressive tone that has dominated our political discourse for the past eight years.
For many viewers, it was a relief to see a civil exchange between the two candidates, who seemed surprisingly respectful of each other. Senator JD Vance demonstrated his skills as both a speaker and debater, garnering a more favorable opinion from many voters.
Governor Tim Walz, on the other hand, while appearing somewhat nervous and haggard, managed to connect with the audience through his likability and relatability. However, the unfortunate reality is that neither candidate did enough to change any votes.
Vance VS. The Walz debate left Americans with this huge achievement
So, what can we learn from this debate?
- address real issues: Frustration arose when candidates failed to answer questions directly. Although skillful pivots are common in debates, ignoring a question will prevent candidates from moving forward effectively. Vance faced tough questions about January 6, while Walz failed to answer questions related to his affiliation with the CCP, leaving voters dissatisfied.
- speak to their truth: Both candidates had their best moments when they used language that resonated with the other side. Vance framed his argument using the language of the left, including “a family model that makes choice possible” and linking gun violence to mental health. In contrast, Walz emphasized his respect for the Second Amendment and asserted, “I am not pro-abortion.”
- address key concerns: To change attitudes, candidates must directly address the biggest concerns in the minds of voters. For Vance, his toughest moment came during the January 6 debate. For Walz, the challenge lies in explaining clearly how he and Kamala Harris plan to address economic issues, particularly inflation.
- Focus on relevant issues: Voters wanted a more detailed discussion of the ongoing attacks and their broader impacts, relations with Iran and Israel, climate change and cost of living concerns. With significant challenges facing the nation, voters were disappointed that the moderators did not push the candidates to more thoroughly address these important topics.
- effective storytelling: While storytelling can create a connection with voters, there’s a fine line between relatable anecdotes and fabricated narratives. Vance’s efforts to connect with voters through personal stories — about his Appalachian roots and family struggles — seemed a bit forced to some, echoing Kamala Harris’s often criticized story about her middle-class upbringing. Stories work best when they connect to relevant issues rather than distract from answering difficult questions.
Despite various pundits highlighting the strengths of the two vice presidential candidates, Tuesday night’s debate ultimately had little impact on undecided voters. While Walz’s performance was met with successes, his nervous start and notable mistakes left much to be desired. In the end, both candidates offered something for everyone—but for those who were still considering their options, there were no compelling reasons to change their minds.
Click here for more Fox News opinion
As we approach the final rounds of the presidential election, the challenge for both candidates and their running mates is clear: How can they win over undecided voters in just 33 days? The answer lies in two important areas:
First, they must build confidence in their ability to deal with inflation and rising costs of living
Given the current economic environment, this task may be easier Former President Donald TrumpEspecially in light of the anticipated consequences of the port strike and rising energy prices due to the turmoil in the Middle East.
Second, they need reassurance that tomorrow will be better than today.
That there is a leader in the office who has their back. Voters are understandably worried about the future, and both candidates have already capitalized on that anxiety.Vice President Kamala Harris And Walz highlighted the threats to democracy and Trump and Vance focused on the difficulties we face with the economy and immigration.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Yet, what Americans urgently need now is reassurance: a promise that if they cast their vote for the right candidate, life will be better once again. In turbulent times marked by international conflictRising prices, and the consequences of natural disasters, the message of hope and stability is not just important; This is necessary.
As election day approaches, his ability to inspire and reassure voters will determine the next leader of this country.
